Boris Johnson faces new criticism for his behavior toward Partygate as the Public Standards Committee issues a statement raising questions about his commitment to upholding the ministerial code.
Members of the independent oversight body are believed to have been particularly annoyed by Johnson’s decision last week not to give his independent ethics adviser, Lord Hyde, the power to launch his own investigations in the future.
This was one of nine recommendations made by the commission earlier this year, of which Johnson has implemented only two – one of which is to allow ministers to flee their resignation for minor offenses.
A source close to the committee said members were outraged by what they considered “picking cherries” – and that its chairman, Jonathan Evans, former director general of MI5, was expected to express those concerns publicly.
Even before Partygate, Johnson’s government was accused of undermining standards in public life, including overturning a statement by Hyde’s predecessor, Alex Allen, that Interior Minister Priti Patel had harassed officials, albeit inadvertently. Alan resigned in protest.
Geidt used his annual report, released on Tuesday, to raise what he called a “legitimate question” as to whether Johnson had violated the ministerial code by receiving a fixed penalty notice for violating blocking rules. The Code includes a “comprehensive obligation” to comply with the law.
Hyde is reportedly considering resigning due to the fact that Johnson was unable to make a statement by Tuesday night explaining why he believes he did not break the code. However, it is clear that he does not intend to retire now.
The prime minister, who is the supreme arbiter of the ministerial code, then issued a letter acquitting him on several grounds, including the fact that he apologized and did not believe he was breaking the rules at the time.
He also said that he believed that the principles of good behavior in public life, which include selflessness and integrity, remain “the basis of standards in our country and in this administration.”
Johnson is still facing an investigation by the House of Commons Privileges Committee into whether he lied to lawmakers when he repeatedly claimed that “all directions were followed” on Downing Street.
The Committee on Standards in Public Life is an independent body that advises the Prime Minister. Evans has already expressed concern about the government’s proposed reforms to the standards system.
He said in a letter to Cabinet Minister Lord True last week: “We remain of the opinion that a system in which an independent adviser requires the permission of the prime minister to launch an investigation is not independent enough.
“In the same way, the current arrangements preserve the risk – regardless of the sanction – that the prime minister could directly revoke the adviser if a violation is found, circumstances that would critically undermine trust in the adviser’s office.
In Hyde’s annual report, he appears to be trying to avoid this possibility by refusing to advise the prime minister on whether Johnson himself has violated the code.
Add Comment