The left is stepping up violent rhetoric against SCOTUS
The party, which has spent the past 16 months denouncing the Republican Party as a rebel, is now waging a pro-government uprising against the federal judiciary, Laura Ingram said.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
Laura Ingraham discussed how the purpose of the Supreme Court’s expired abortion project was to terrorize Friday at The Ingraham Angle.
LORA INGRAHAM: Of course, criticisms of the opinion are dishonest, constitutional and deceptive in fact. The issue of abortion simply goes back to the states. We’ve been talking about this for the last few nights, and then the voters of those states will determine the outcome of the abortion. It can be regulated, it can be banned, it can be allowed in certain cases or in the first trimester, it can be banned. So it will not be universal for all coast to coast.
THEY WANT TO USE VIOLENCE TO GET IT, AND THIS IS A SHAME: GOP SENATOR
But the left does not want voters to have a say and are not interested in facts or principles. For them, this leak of the draft opinion itself, organized and disseminated as it was. It is meant to terrorize, not influence. Think about this. Why would anyone distribute what was a quarterly draft opinion that was already in one form or another, probably coming out in June anyway. And tonight, however, given everything I have seen, everything I know about the court and its internal work since I served, I will say that I believe that this leak was made in order to incite violence against conservative judges. , mainly in court. In other words, the goal is to change the composition of the court before the November elections.
Election March in Washington, May 4, 1992. A protester carried a poster reading “My Mind, My Body, My Choice.” (Photo by Alfred Gescheidt / Getty Images)
Sounds disgusting. I know it sounds like a completely horrifying prospect. But those who believe that the dismemberment of third-trimester babies is somehow a sacred right protected by the Constitution. Could these people be very well able to rationalize other insidious actions? Now, why don’t politicians from both parties oppose the apparent effort to interfere or intimidate the judiciary?
SEE THE FULL VIDEO HERE:
Add Comment