Ethics adviser Boris Johnson has resigned over Plan 10, which risked “deliberate violation of the Ministerial Code”, his resignation letter revealed.
However, Christopher Hyde’s letter failed to completely lift the lid on the controversy – which Downing Street described as a “commercially sensitive issue in the national interest”.
In an angry letter – which the government first tried to suppress – Lord Hyde said he had been put in an “impossible and disgusting” position because of the request to advise the plan.
“This would make a mockery not only of respect for the Code, but would also allow the suspension of its provisions in the management of the conduct of Her Majesty’s Ministers. “I can’t take part in that,” he wrote.
He was already holding on to the role “with very little difference” because of Mr Johnson’s refusal to allow him to investigate the Partygate scandal, the adviser said.
In his reply, Mr Johnson hinted that the issue concerned steel tariffs related to the new post-Brexit trade defense authority and the need to protect an important industry from damage.
The planned move would potentially violate “obligations” to the World Trade Organization, the response acknowledged.
Lord Hyde’s letter added: “The idea that the Prime Minister may to some extent be engaged in intentionally violating his own code is an insult.
“It would be an intentional violation or even an intention to suspend the provisions of the Code in order to meet a political goal.
Caroline Lucas, a Green MP, tweeted: “No wonder the Prime Minister tried to keep Lord Hyde’s resignation letter a secret – it’s absolutely desperate. How the hell is our completely shameless, rule-breaking prime minister still in office?
Diana Johnson, a Labor MP, mockingly asked: “What’s wrong with the Prime Minister, which makes him so unlucky in retaining ethics and anti-corruption advisers?”
The resignation – the second by Mr Johnson’s ministerial code adviser in less than three years – has forced Downing Street to struggle to find a replacement ready to take on the poisonous pot.
In the municipality, the general payer, Michael Ellis, refused to confirm that a new councilor would be appointed – despite many accusations of insidiousness against the current government.
Lord Hyde’s letter also revealed that he had decided to resign before his session on evidentiary bruises before a committee of deputies on Tuesday.
He hinted that he would have investigated Mr Johnson – if he had been allowed to – whether he had violated the code by being fined for parties № 10.
And he said: “It is reasonable to say that perhaps a fixed notice of punishment and payment to the Prime Minister may constitute a breach of a basic obligation under the Ministerial Code to comply with the law.”
Last year, the Trade Facility (TRA) recommended the abolition of some tariffs on Chinese steel, but it was rejected by the government following protests by the steel industry.
One trade expert said the tariffs had been extended by one year, but only until the end of this month, suggesting ministers are ready to repeal the TRA for a second time without a legal justification.
In his reply, Mr Johnson wrote that his plan included “protecting an important industry” which “will suffer material damage if we do not continue to apply such tariffs”.
Mr Johnson’s spokesman declined to confirm whether steel was the industry in question, saying Lord Hyde had not provided any “official advice”.
“The Prime Minister sought advice from Lord Hyde on this issue and the interaction with the Ministerial Code. This is not unusual in itself, “he said.
He added: “The Independent TRA has provided advice to ministers who have found that a critical national industry is at risk of material damage if the government does not take action affecting business and livelihoods.
“Ultimately, this is a government decision. No decision has been taken on this specific issue so far. “
In a statement, the TRA said the case mentioned in Lord Hyde’s letter had been “summoned” by the government earlier this year, meaning ministers had full power to make decisions about it.
“The TRA conducted a government-led analysis and we provided a report on the findings of the Secretary of State for International Trade on June 1,” the statement said.
“The Findings Report is an analytical part of the work designed to inform government decisions and does not contain recommendations from the TRA.”
Add Comment