Substitute while the actions of the article are loading
It had been only 80 minutes since the US Supreme Court had overturned Rowe vs. Wade on Friday, when doctor Nisha Verma’s phone rang with an urgent group message from another obstetrician-gynecologist, which made her catch her breath.
There was a woman in Wisconsin carrying a fetus with anencephaly, a fatal birth defect that lacked parts of the brain and skull. Because the abortion was probably illegal in the state, the clinic had canceled her appointment to terminate it later that day. But forcing her to continue the pregnancy was cruel and risked complications. What should I do? the doctor writes.
While colleagues in other parts of the Midwest responded with information about clinics outside the state, Verma mentally added the case to its growing list of gray area situations where new abortion bans fail to capture the complexity of modern medicine and mislead doctors.
“There are so many unanswered questions,” said Verma, an obstetrician / gynecologist in Atlanta, where the six-week abortion ban, which has been postponed, could be activated soon. “The decision creates confusion and fear because we know what to do from a medical point of view, but we do not know what we can do based on the law.
The Supreme Court’s decision to send abortion regulatory powers back to the states means that there are now 50 states with different approaches, each with its own unique language and interpretation of where to draw the line between when the procedure is appropriate and when it is a crime. .
Graphics: Abortion is now banned in these states. Others will follow.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has joined many other professional organizations and medical journals in recent days to warn that the decision will affect health care beyond abortion, creating new risks for patients and potentially increasing maternal mortality. Doctors have expressed concern about the impact on situations, including miscarriage and in vitro fertilization. Medical practice will change, the group said, or even oppose “laws that are not based on science or based on evidence.”
Even obstetricians who oppose abortion recognize the medical nuances.
Abortion providers from Georgia to California have expressed their feelings about the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Rowe and Wade. (Video: Whitney Shefte, Whitney Leaming / The Washington Post, Photo: Eric Lee for The Washington Post / The Washington Post)
Christina Francis, an Indiana physician and board member of the American Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists for Life, said in an interview that “sometimes there are clinical situations that are unclear” about whether there is a need to terminate a pregnancy. But Francis said that in her career, working in Catholic hospitals that ban selective abortion, she has always felt able to intervene by removing the tissue of pregnancy when medically necessary, such as in ectopic pregnancy. pregnancy when the embryo is implanted outside the womb and cannot survive.
“There will be an educational process,” Francis said, explaining that many doctors have been trained to prioritize the mother during pregnancy, but will now have to consider two lives – the mother’s and the fetus’s – equally. “I have never felt that my hands are tied to take care of my patients with anything other than excellent health care.
6 conclusions from the opinion of the Supreme Court, which ended Rowe against Wade
Three states – Kentucky, Louisiana and South Dakota – banned the proceedings immediately after the Supreme Court ruling. (The Louisiana Act was blocked by a state court three days later, with a hearing scheduled for next month.) Ten have trigger laws that have already come into force or will come into force in the coming weeks. About a dozen others have in advancedeer bans or restrictions that can be activated quickly, or conservative legislatures that discuss them. In Wisconsin, the 1849 abortion ban is part of state law, and although the attorney general of the Democratic Party said he would not impose it, clinics suspended services on Friday. This means that abortion may cease to be an option in the near future in half of the country.
Verma, an ACOG associate who is post-deer A working group organized by medical groups in Georgia said there was concern in their discussions that even routine treatments or procedures such as giving anesthesia or chemotherapy to pregnant patients could put doctors at risk of prosecution because of the possibility of fetal injury. . She wonders, “Will surgeons be afraid to intervene when a pregnant patient ruptures her appendix because she may inadvertently terminate the pregnancy?”
“We treat this as a disaster response,” Verma said. “We are in an emergency situation and this is a disaster.
Even before the turmoil created by the rollover deer, obstetrics and gynecology were considered one of the most challenging specialties of medicine because of high-pressure decision-making and high-risk operations. The United States suffers from a shortage of thousands of obstetricians and gynecologists, and many counties do not have a single provider.
The new reproductive landscape may further discourage medical students from pursuing this field in the future and leave all trainees with holes in their knowledge due to the new bans. In a study published in obstetrics and gynecology, Cavita Vinecar, an assistant clinical professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, and her co-authors found that approximately half of medical residences will be in states that have or are expected to restrict or prohibit abortion; residents will no longer have access to this training, despite the fact that it is a requirement of the board of certified medical accreditation.
“In our political climate, there are abortion and obstetric care in different buckets,” Vinekar explained. “But clinically all areas are so interconnected.”
A week after the expiration of a draft decision on Roe v. Wade, The Post spoke to two women about health conditions that could make pregnancy life-threatening for them. (Video: Sarah Parnassus / Washington Post)
In McCall, Idaho, about 100 miles outside of Boys, family doctor Caitlin Gustafson does everything from care for the elderly and emergency trauma to the birth of babies.
The ban on abortion should take effect in about 30 days in her state. Gustafson she said she had read state law more than 100 times, but still could not figure out what was allowed – and what was a crime that could take her to jail.
“Every time I read it, I get more and more confused,” she said.
A few weeks ago, the woman’s waters ruptured in early pregnancy, long before the fetus became viable. In these situations, doctors usually advise women that they are at risk of sepsis, a systemic infection, and leave it up to them to decide how to proceed. Some choose abortion while others wait for it – but the longer they wait, the longer the risk of life-threatening complications. Gustafson said she was clear he could give the woman a choice in this case. But what about the next patient in such circumstances after the ban takes effect?
On 1 page, Idaho’s law is longer than most and involves attempts to define some terms. But Gustafson, who worked as a doctor for more than 20 years, Phrases such as “the best chance for the unborn child to survive” do not have clear medical definitions and can be interpreted in different ways. The law makes an exception to the ban on rape or incest, but people who want an abortion in these circumstances must provide a doctor with a copy of a report from a law enforcement agency.
Gustafson worries that the barrier is too high. Few people would want to make such a report, she said, and doctors would have difficulty assessing its authenticity.
“I will personally have to consult a lawyer and this would lead to further delays,” she said.
In addition, she explained, many complications associated with pregnancy – including infection, as well as preeclampsia, in which blood pressure can rise sharply – include a gradual descent into a life-threatening condition. It is not clear how ill the patient must be before the state exception begins, which allows abortion to save the mother’s life and the patient has the right to terminate the pregnancy.
Gustafson said the new law would lead to a “complete disruption of the doctor-patient relationship” as it concerns reproductive health care.
She worries that it could take years for lawyers and courts to resolve these issues: “It will not be short-lived. This will go on and on. ”
Doctors, meanwhile, are unaware of the steps they can take by law to protect the lives of their pregnant patients.
In Nashville, Edward Hills, a doctor at Meharry Medical College, a historical black college, predicted that doctors would have to spend more time thinking about how to “defend ourselves against legal challenges.”
“It’s going to slow things down,” Hills said.
The near-complete abortion ban is due to take effect in Tennessee in a month, but the state’s attorney general has filed a motion to impose restrictions earlier.
Hills worries that in the event of a miscarriage, which is clear because there is no longer a heart rhythm, doctors may still want a second person to confirm the ultrasound once the new law goes into effect “in the event that supervisor ”and accuses the medical provider of miscarriage.
Hills, who completed his medical residency in 1974, a year later Rowe vs. Wade legalized the right to abortion across the country, said he had seen some “terrible things” with women trying to deal with abortion on their own. The United States already has the highest maternal mortality rates in the developed world, affecting disproportionately poor women and women of color. He worries not only about the risk of death, but also about their ability to carry babies in …
Add Comment