Canada

Older mothers face stigma from official medical publications, study finds


Breadcrumb Trail links

  1. Women
  2. Local news
  3. Family and child

“Studies show that older women are often better prepared to have children,” notes Professor Francesca Scala of Concordia University’s Department of Political Science.

Article author:

La Presse Canadienne

Clara Deskerninges

A doctor performs an ultrasound scan on a pregnant woman at a hospital in Chicago, August. 7, 2018. Photo by Teresa Crawford/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Article content

As more and more Canadians choose to have children later in life, a recent study shows that pregnancy at age 35 and older tends to be stigmatized by medical recommendations and public policies.

Advertisement 2

This ad has not yet loaded, but your article continues below.

Article content

“There is a lot of emphasis on biomedical risks,” explains Francesca Scala, professor of political science at Concordia University and co-author of the study.

Some risk factors may increase with age. The Public Health Agency of Canada cites “preterm birth, low birth weight, miscarriage, placenta previa, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery” as problems that may become more common.

But while acknowledging that these are “valid concerns” and mothers-to-be should be well-informed before making decisions, Scala stresses that such an emphasis can paint older mothers as “at risk” or “abnormal” or “irresponsible reproductive citizens”.

For example, PHAC wrote in a 2008 paper that the trend to delay pregnancies until later in life is “of enormous clinical and societal concern.”

Advertising 3

This ad has not yet loaded, but your article continues below.

Article content

In Quebec, as of November 2021, IVF costs are covered only for women under 42 because of the lower chance of pregnancy, which declines rapidly around that age.

And even if various organizations take great care not to impose any moral judgment on the value of a person’s life with a disability, much emphasis is placed on the likelihood of an elderly mother giving birth to a child with a disability, Scala said.

“There’s this idea that women are solely responsible for children … that motherhood consumes their whole lives.” Women who are older, who have gray hair, are not seen as ‘ideal mothers’.

She cites one of the cited studies on IVF recommendations produced by the Canadian Medical Association in 2015. While the text says that preventing women from accessing these services would be unethical, it adds that “older women have a higher risk of complications that could endanger the safety of the offspring, as well as psychological or social discomfort that the child could experience if the mother is old enough to be a grandmother.

Advertising 4

This ad has not yet loaded, but your article continues below.

Article content

Scala says he thinks ageism “has a role in it.”

She notes that “studies show that older women are often better equipped to have children. They have the financial resources to care for their offspring and have a stable relationship.

“Recent studies also show that older motherhood is associated with long-term benefits for children, such as better language skills and better academic achievement.”

But without bad intentions, personal aspirations and motherhood are often presented as opposition, she said. For example, a guideline published by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada in 2011 explained that because of the mistaken belief that assisted reproduction always works, “unfortunately, this can give women a false sense of optimism that they can delay pregnancy while they pursue their education and careers.’

The guide has since been withdrawn from society.

“On the one hand, women are encouraged to have a career, to be self-sufficient and to have a stable relationship, but on the other hand, we warn them that their biological clock is ticking,” Scala says.

The study, titled “Questioning Older Motherhood in Canada: Ageism, Ability, and Risk Matter,” was published in March by the journal Health, Risk & Society. It examines about 20 publications from health associations and governments from 1993 to 2021.

Share this article on your social network

Advertisement 1

This ad has not yet loaded, but your article continues below.

Sign up to receive daily breaking news from the Montreal Gazette, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.

By clicking the signup button, you agree to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of our emails. Postmedia Network Inc. | 365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4 | 416-383-2300

Thanks for signing up!

A welcome email is on its way. If you don’t see it, please check your spam folder.

The next issue of Montreal Gazette Headline News will be in your inbox soon.

We encountered a problem registering you. Please, try again

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourages all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments can take up to an hour to be moderated before they appear on the site. Please keep your comments relevant and respectful. We’ve enabled email notifications – you’ll now receive an email if you get a reply to your comment, there’s an update to a comment thread you’re following, or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.