Canada

The judge rejects Amber Heard’s request to overturn Depp’s victory

Matthew Barakat and Dennis Lavoie, Associated Press Posted on Wed Jul 13 2022 9:43 pm EDT

FALLS CHURCH, Va. (AP) — A Virginia judge on Wednesday rejected an attempt by actress Amber Heard to overturn a $10 million judgment awarded against her in favor of her ex-husband Johnny Depp.

Depp won a defamation lawsuit against Heard last month in a high-profile civil trial. Heard won a smaller $2 million judgment in a counterclaim she filed against Depp.

Earlier this month, Heard filed a motion to have Depp’s conviction overturned or declared a mistrial. Her attorneys cited multiple factors, including an apparent case of mistaken identity with one of the jurors.

In a written order, Judge Penny Azcarate dismissed all of Heard’s claims and said the jury question was irrelevant and that Heard could not prove she was prejudiced.

“The juror was examined, sat for the whole jury, deliberated and reached a verdict. The only evidence before this court is that this juror and all jurors followed their oaths, instructions and orders of the court. This court is bound by the jury’s competent verdict,” Azkarate wrote.

Depp is suing for $50 million in Fairfax County after Heard wrote an op-ed in The Washington Post about domestic violence in 2018, calling herself a “public figure representing domestic violence.” The article never mentioned Depp by name, but his lawyers said several passages in the article indirectly defamed him by referring to widespread allegations of abuse she made in 2016 when she filed for divorce.

Heard then countersued for $100 million, also for defamation. By the time the case went to court, her counterclaim was reduced to a few statements made by one of Depp’s lawyers, who called Heard’s allegations of abuse a hoax.

The jury awarded Depp $15 million and Heard $2 million on her counterclaim. The $15 million judgment was reduced to $10.35 million because Virginia law limits punitive damages to $350,000.

The judge did not provide a rationale for dismissing Heard’s other claims in Wednesday’s order.

Among other things, Hurd argued that the $10 million verdict was not supported by the facts and appeared to demonstrate that the jury failed to focus on the implications of the 2018 copyright material — as it was supposed to — and instead simply have taken a broad look at the damage Depp’s reputation has suffered as a result of the alleged abuse.

Heard’s lawyers also argued that the convictions for Depp on the one hand and Heard on the other were fundamentally meaningless.

“The dueling jury verdicts are inconsistent and irreconcilable,” wrote her attorneys, Elaine Bredehoft and Benjamin Rothenborn.

Heard’s attorneys also challenged the conviction on the grounds that one of the seven jurors deciding the case was never summoned to the jury. A 77-year-old county resident received a jury summons, according to court documents. But the man’s son, who bears the same name and lives at the same address, responded to the draft and served in his stead.

Hurd’s attorneys argued that Virginia law is strict about juror identification and that a case of mistaken identity is grounds for error. They did not present evidence that the 52-year-old son, identified in court documents only as Juror No. 15, purposefully or maliciously tried to replace his father, but they said the possibility should not be dismissed.

“The Court cannot hold, as Mr. Depp requests, that the apparently improper service of Juror 15 was innocent error. It may have been a deliberate attempt to serve on a jury in a high-profile case,” Heard’s lawyers wrote.

Hurd still has the option of appealing the sentence to the Virginia Court of Appeals. The issues presented to the appeals court may be different from the issues Azcarate dismissed Wednesday.

In a separate order, the judge ordered dozens of court documents unsealed, including requests to compel independent medical examinations of Depp and Heard. A few documents will remain sealed, mostly because they contain personal contact information or personal medical information.

“On this matter both parties sued each other, thus opening themselves up to the public forum of a trial.” Court records are public information,” Azkarate wrote.

___

An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that Depp is suing for $25 million and that Heard’s counterclaim is seeking $50 million. ___

Lavoie reported from Richmond.