In a historic ruling 6-3 on June 24, the Supreme Court voted to overturn Rowe against Wade, abolishing the constitutional right to abortion. Shortly after the decision was announced, an alarming call to action quickly surfaced online: Delete your cycle tracking apps.
The tweet may have been deleted (opens in a new tab)
This is not the first time this mood has appeared on the Internet. Earlier this year, when a leak from the Supreme Court warned us of the decision to come, the same message spread on Twitter, TikTok, Instagram and more. Women and people with uteruses who rely on these applications to monitor their health suddenly feared how the data they collected could be used against them in a hypothetical abortion case. With this latest Supreme Court ruling – and Judge Thomas’ call for the court to investigate further cases of confidentiality such as Griswald, Lawrence and Obergefel – this hypothetically seems much more possible.
Here’s what you need to know about the ways in which period tracking applications treat your data and how it can affect your reproductive health concerns.
SEE ALSO: Your privacy is at stake now that Rowe and Wade have fallen, experts warn
Can apps just transfer your data?
In a typical cycle tracking application, users enter data such as which day their flow started and stopped, how severe other physical symptoms can be. The app then usually learns the user’s patterns and helps predict when their next period may come, when they may be most fertile and whether they have missed a period and should take a pregnancy test.
With the repeal of Roe v. Wade, data activists and privacy experts are concerned about how that data could be used to prove that someone may have had or thought of having an abortion.
Although there is currently no precedent for how this specific data would be processed in a criminal case, applications have generally cooperated with criminal investigations in the past, usually in cases against child exploitation. Thus, it is important where each user is located and whether their state is one of the 26 “safe or likely” to legally prohibit abortions without Roe v. Wade. Some of these states had trigger laws pending Rowe’s decision against Wade, meaning abortion was banned immediately in some and would be banned in 30 days in others.
“Because the approach in many states will be to criminalize people for acting or seeking or providing abortion services, it’s crucial for people in those states to understand that a mobile device is essentially a tracking device,” said Jackie Singh. , a former senior cybersecurity department. employee of Biden’s presidential campaign, at Mashable. “While most people tend to leave our Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and location services permanently turned on for convenience and rarely use VPNs or other privacy software, people who may have recently been prosecuted as criminals no longer have the luxury of keeping as completely free and legal citizens. “
What to look for when choosing a period tracking app
If you live in a country where this data is at risk, but you want to continue using your app, it’s important to take a closer look at the history of your particular app with data sharing, its privacy policy, and where it stores your data.
The popular free Flo Tracking app, which has 43 million active users, was criticized for sharing data last year, reaching an agreement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations that the app did not inform its users about where share their data. In this case, the Wall Street Journal found that Flo informed Facebook every time its users indicated that they had a cycle or wanted to get pregnant.
Although Flo did not acknowledge any breaches of the agreement and insisted to NPR that it did not share health data with any third party, this investigation and agreement leaves room for doubt as to how the privacy practices of the application are currently applied and how this can change, when under pressure from a criminal investigation. In response to Roe’s cancellation against Wade, Flo issued a statement saying he would soon launch a new “anonymous regime” that removes personal identities from users’ data. It remains to be seen how this mode will work.
In response, many app users are urging others to switch to the free Clue app, a European company that currently has about 12 million users. According to Roe’s response to Wade, all health data for the period it receives are extremely secure due to its obligation to apply special protections to reproductive health data in accordance with European data confidentiality legislation. Clue promises that its business model does not rely on selling data to third parties and that all data collected is de-identified and encrypted. It is important to note, however, that Flo is also based in London, where the same laws had to be applied and seemingly failed.
The tweet may have been deleted (opens in a new tab) The tweet may have been deleted (opens in a new tab)
“Because data is so lucrative, and data collection and user profiling are a major part of most applications’ business models, few applications have any real, demonstrable commitment to privacy, such as a transparency report that presents the company’s position on of data collection, “Singh said. Although her standards are high, Singh cited apps like Drip and Euki as possible contenders for apps that “should keep women in the blue states safe” because of their commitment to local storage and its refusal to allow third-party tracking. Singh still suggests using them only in the blue states for an extra layer of protection against towed network surveillance.
Andrea Ford, a research associate at the University of Edinburgh, also recommended that NPR users pay attention to where their data is stored when choosing an application. If stored locally on your actual device, Evan Greer, director of the digital rights group Fight for the Future, tells NPR that the court will need a search warrant for your phone, which has “a much higher legal limit “for receipt of a summons. If stored in the cloud and owned by the company, a subpoena would suffice.
“Data stored in healthcare applications before the SCOTUS decision is unlikely to pose a major risk,” Singh said. “However, I would warn people who are menstruating to stop using any type of application to monitor their menstrual health if they have any expectations of having a presence in states that are expected to ban abortion. However, we obviously can’t predict how future legislation will affect us, so the safest thing is to stop digital tracking. “
Add Comment