WILMINGTON, Delaware, July 12 (Reuters) – Twitter Inc ( TWTR.N ) sued Elon Musk on Tuesday for breaching its $44 billion deal to buy the social media platform and asked a Delaware court to order the richest person in the world to complete the merger at the agreed $54.20 per Twitter share.
“Musk clearly believes that he — unlike any other party subject to Delaware contract law — is free to change his mind, break up the company, disrupt its operations, destroy shareholder value, and walk away,” says in the complaint.
The case sets in motion what promises to be one of the biggest legal battles in Wall Street history, involving one of the business world’s most colorful entrepreneurs in what will become hard-hitting contractual language.
Sign up now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com
I am registering
On Friday, Musk said he was ending the deal because Twitter breached the agreement by failing to respond to requests for information about fake or spam accounts on the platform, which is central to its business performance. Read more
Musk, who is chief executive of electric vehicle maker Tesla Inc, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The lawsuit accuses Musk of a “long list” of violations of the merger agreement that “cast a stain on Twitter and its business.” It is the first time employee outflows are said to be “up” since the deal was announced.
Twitter also accused Musk of “secretly” stockpiling shares in the company between January and March without properly disclosing his significant purchases to regulators, and said he “instead continued to stockpile Twitter stock while the market was no longer wise”.
Shares of the social media platform closed at $34.06 on Tuesday, up 4.3%, but sharply below the $50-plus levels where it was trading when the deal was approved by Twitter’s board in late April. Shares added another 1% after the bell.
Musk said he was ending the merger because of the lack of information about spam accounts and inaccurate statements, which he said constituted a “significant adverse event.” He also said that the departure of an executive amounted to a failure to conduct business in the usual course — although Twitter said it removed that text from the merger agreement during negotiations.
Twitter also said it did not share more information with Musk about spam accounts because it feared he would build a competing platform after abandoning the acquisition.
Twitter called the reasons cited by Musk a “baseless pretext” and said his decision to step down had more to do with the stock market slump, especially for tech stocks.
Shares of Tesla, the main source of Musk’s wealth, have lost about 30% of their value since the deal was announced and closed Tuesday at $699.21.
In a separate statement, Twitter asked the court to schedule a four-day trial in mid-September.
Legal experts said that from the information that is public, it appears that Twitter has the upper hand. Read more
“In its complaint, Twitter takes a firm position that Musk had a case of buyer’s remorse — and that, not bots, was the reason for his decision to back out of the deal,” said Brian Quinn, a professor at Boston College School of Law. “The facts that Twitter presents here make an extremely strong case for Twitter to make this deal.”
Musk is among the most followed accounts on Twitter, and the lawsuit included images of several of his tweets, including emoticons, which the company said violated the merger’s “non-disparagement” clause.
Musk tweeted the emoji on May 16 in response to two tweets from Parag Agrawal, Twitter’s CEO, explaining the company’s efforts to combat spam accounts.
It also included an image of a text message Musk sent to Agrawal after Twitter asked on June 28 for assurances about Musk’s financing of the deal.
“Your lawyers are using these conversations to create trouble,” Musk wrote to Agrawal. “This has got to stop.”
Twitter noted that after Musk said he was ending the deal, he sent tweets on Monday that Twitter said suggested his spam requests were part of a plan to force spam data into the public domain.
“To Musk, it appears that Twitter, the interests of its shareholders, the transaction Musk agreed to, and the legal process to enforce it all represent an elaborate joke,” the lawsuit says.
Sign up now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com
I am registering
Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; Editing by Chris Rees, Noeline Walder and Matthew Lewis
Our standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
Add Comment